Mark Winston Griffith
The Federal Reserve Fails Leadership Test on Subprime Crisis
"The staff of the Financial Services Committee and I have had a chance to review the Federal Reserve's proposed rules regarding abusive subprime loans. We now have confirmation of two facts we have known for some time: one, the Federal Reserve System is not a strong advocate for consumers, and two, there is no Santa Claus. People who are surprised by the one are presumably surprised by the other."
-- Rep. Barney Frank, chairman of the House Committee on Financial Services, December 18, 2007
On the same day the Federal Reserve proposed a new set rules to help guard against predatory subprime lending practices, the New York Times reported on the Fed's historical failure to respond to subprime abuses, despite alarms that advocacy groups (including NEDAP) and others have been sounding for years. The truth is, with literally millions of toxic, exotic loans having already been made, and with investors in the subprime mortgage industry in retreat, regulating the subprime industry at this stage is like sending in the bomb squad into Hiroshima after viewing the mushroom cloud.
Nonetheless, there is a desperate need for a new set of standards for mortgage lending. And the Fed's proposed rules, which will now face a public comment period, focused on four areas of subprime lending that are certainly worthy of concern: Ensuring the borrowers ability to pay; limiting pre-payment penalties; mandating the establishment of escrow accounts for insurance and taxes; and eliminating "no doc" or "stated income" lending.
Unfortunately, a close reading by both policy makers and fair lending advocates has exposed significant weaknesses in the proposed rules. One of the most damning assessments is made in a statement issued by Senator Chris Dodd. The Federal Reserve, he said, does "not even have the courage of its convictions - - the Board weakened its earlier guidance on requiring an originator to fully analyze a borrower's ability to repay the mortgage at the fully indexed rate, the most fundamental measure of good lending. Because this rule requires a showing of a 'pattern and practice' of violations, no individual subprime borrower would be guaranteed the protections that the earlier guidance promised to extend -- that the mortgage they receive will be affordable to them, even after the payment shock hits."
If the Fed rules ultimately don't ensure that mortgages are affordable to borrowers AFTER adjustable rates have re-set, they will have missed their mark entirely.
In the coming weeks, as advocates have a chance to fully analyze the rules, a more comprehensive critique will unfold. In the meantime, considering how long it is taking Congress to respond to the subprime and foreclosure crises, there seems to have been more than one Nero fiddling while Rome has burned.
Posted at 1:00 AM, Dec 21, 2007 in Financial Justice | Mortgage Crisis | Permalink | Comments (1)








Comments
THE FEDERAL RESERVE SHOULD BE ABOLISHED
In Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution, the people of the United States granted Congress the power "to coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures.” The people never gave congress the constitutional power to delegate this money-creating and regulating responsibility to any private group. Yet this is exactly what the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 did. The bill was publicly promoted as a plan to reform the nation's monetary system and stabilize the currency by taking control of it out of the hands of big bankers. In reality, of course, the Federal Reserve Act was written by the big bankers for the purpose of solidifying their control over our currency.
Many Americans today wrongfully believe that the Federal Reserve is somehow part of the federal government, possibly even the Treasury Department. Many do not know that the Federal Reserve is actually a cartel of private banks that was given the power to be the sole issuer of U.S. money, with full control over its quantity and thus its value. Since this group of private bankers (the Fed) provides credit to the U.S. government when we spend money we don’t have, the Fed also is able to profit handsomely from the ever-increasing national debt. Because the Fed makes more money when the country goes deeper into debt, there is no incentive for the Fed to support any reductions in federal deficit spending. The more credit we need, the more money this cartel of private banks will make.
The actions the Fed takes can drastically affect the economy simply by making decisions about the money supply and interest rates. The president, congress, big business, investors, home buyers and anyone else with an interest in our economy waits with baited breath every time the Federal Reserve Board meets. If they decide to raise interest rates, politicians and industries could fall, homes might not be purchased and jobs could be lost. If the Fed decides to lower the interest rates, politicians, industries, investors and consumers may prosper. There is too much power vested in a handful of people whose names would not be recognized by most Americans.
Why do we allow such a small group of people on the Federal Reserve Board to wield so much power over our country’s economic well-being? As average Americans strive to earn a living, cope with rising costs of food, fuel and hopefully save or invest for the future, Congress and the Federal Reserve Bank are working insidiously against them. On a daily basis, every dollar they have is being devalued.
Even though most Americans seem unaware of the current plight of the US dollar, especially in relation to the Euro, there is definitely a dollar crisis in the world economy because of the immense size of the international debt of America. America has now become the largest debtor in history, owing somewhere between $70 and $100 Trillion. The reckless deficit spending by our government, coupled with Federal Reserve currency devaluation, has become one of the greatest threats facing America today. Because Congress is routinely spending more than it can tax or borrow and the Fed is routinely printing “Fiat Money” (Dollars backed by nothing) out of thin air to make up the difference, this classic “one-two punch” threatens to further destroy the value of our dollars.
The actions of both major political parties would seem to indicate that they want the Fed to print more “Fiat Money” to support their extravagant and unchecked spending habits. Most politicians want the printing presses to run faster and faster, create more credit, issue rebate checks, etc., so that the economy will somehow be magically healed by this dangerous financial potion, or so they believe. The President and members of Congress may love a system that generates more and more money for their special interest projects and earmarks, but the rest of us have good reason to be concerned about our monetary system and the future value of our American dollars.
Issuing “Fiat Money” has allowed our government to live well beyond its means, but that practice cannot continue much longer as it is slowly destroying the value of our dollars. History shows us that when the destruction of monetary value becomes rampant, as the actions of our congress and the Fed would indicate, nearly everyone suffers and both the economic and political structure becomes unstable. The Federal Reserve System has been the tool used by the major bankers to allow them to gain control over the smaller regional and local banks. The Fed has also acted as the financing agency for Congress' unprecedented deficit spending on an ever growing, more intrusive federal bureaucracy and the expansion of the welfare state. Some people believe that the private bankers in the Federal Reserve wield so much power that they can intentionally manipulate the economy in order to influence the results of our presidential elections.
Our government and the American people do not need the help of any private banking cartel to manage our monetary system. We need to repeal the Federal Reserve Act and return control of our currency to Congress where it belongs, as was the intent of our Founders. We also need to have a serious national discussion about how real currency reform can be achieved. As long as the private bankers in the Federal Reserve have control over our nation's money, Congress' control of the purse-strings will not have the benefits the country’s Founders intended.
I support legislation introduced by Congressman Ron Paul, of Texas, entitled “Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act (H.R. 2755) that will restore financial stability to America's economy by abolishing the Federal Reserve.
REF: H.R. 2755: Federal Reserve Board Abolition Act
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c110:H.R.2755:
By:
JOHN W. WALLACE
Candidate for Congress
New York’s 20th Congressional District
www.FreedomCandidate.com
Posted by: John Wallace | March 16, 2008 05:39 PM