DMI Blog

Ezekiel Edwards

Dear Santa (Regarding the Criminal Justice System)

Dear Santa,

Last night I was going to send you this past year's "naughty or nice" list of people, organizations, and movements related to the criminal justice system, but figured that since you read DMI's blog every morning before you set out for a day's work, and were probably pretty busy last night, I would just post the list here for you to read over your morning coffee.

Oh, and as a reminder, the gifts I would like are a reduction in our prison population, an end to the war on drugs, nationwide abolition of the death penalty, closure of the prison at Guantanamo Bay and all CIA-run secret prisons, the right of detainees to challenge their detentions in federal court through writs of habeas corpus, repeal of the Patriot Act, an end to the Iraq War, funding for public school education, public defender offices, and programs focusing on alternatives to incarceration, rehabilitation, and reentry, the decriminalization of poverty, and a new president and vice president who are the polar opposite of the despots we have had for the past eight years. Thanks!

Deserving of Santa's Presents

The State of New Jersey

For becoming the first state whose legislature abolished capital punishment since the Supreme Court declared it constitutional in 1976.

The Coalition to Raise the Minimum Standards at New York City Jails

For refusing to let the New York City Board of Corrections implement detrimental changes to its Minimum Standards for New York City Correctional Facilities without first hearing from those most affected by such policy changes --- prisoners, their families, and the organizations that work with them. In the end, the Coalition convinced the Board to abandon a number of its ill-conceived ideas.

Florida Governor Charlie Crist

For signing a bill that made it easier for ex-offenders to reclaim their right to vote. In some states, that right is permanently lost with a criminal conviction, and in most others there are numerous unnecessary bureaucratic impediments to regaining it.

Dallas District Attorney Craig Watkins

For responding to an appalling 13 exonerations in Dallas County by (1) instituting an open file policy to encourage competent, effective, and prepared defense counsel for poor people, (2) offering to test earlier convictions for possible DNA evidence to verify whether the right person is in prison; and (3) supporting improvements to police procedures to reduce the risk of wrongful conviction. DA Watkins, as the invited speaker at DMI's Marketplace of Ideas event on October 29, 2007, spoke passionately about these issues, as well as voiced his opposition to the drug war's stubborn and shortsighted reliance on mass imprisonment.

Community Activists

For fighting on behalf of either the Jena Six, a group of African-American teenagers subjected to a racist criminal justice system in Louisiana, or on behalf of Troy Davis, who sits on Georgia's death row, with plausible claims of innocence, awaiting a decision from Georgia's Supreme Court as to whether he lives or dies at the hand of the state.

Peter Wagner and the Prison Policy Initiative

For demanding that the Census Bureau cease counting incarcerated individuals as residents of the counties in which they are imprisoned, which gives certain communities voting power disproportionate to their actual voting populations while simultaneously diluting the voting strength of the communities from which the majority of inmates come.

The Innocence Project

For the exoneration of Jerry Miller, the 200th DNA-based exoneration since the Project began in 1992, and which has now exonerated 210 people, exonerating people at a rate of around 20 per year (not including hundreds more non-DNA-based exonerations), and for seeking policy changes throughout the criminal justice system, including that states properly preserve forensic evidence, that police reform their eyewitness identification procedures, that states compensate every individual they wrongfully imprison, and that states enact or reform laws permitting prisoners to DNA testing of biological evidence. These reforms are as badly needed in New York as anywhere in the country.

The Bronx Defenders

For standing up for the rights of poor people, mostly of color, in the Bronx, one of the poorest counties in the nation, year after year, who are caught up in our oppressive criminal justice system, who have been either ignored or targeted by society's powers-that-be, people who are the victims of New York's zero tolerance over-aggressive policing and incarceration policies, who are forced to spend hours in jail for acts such as possession of marijuana (thanks to New York's assault on poor people's use of marijuana), trespassing, hopping the turnstile, or for the mere concoctions of the police, who have to miss work, wait on line for court, wait hours for their cases to be called, for a lawyer to call their name while in jail, whose lives are simply not deemed by society as equally important or valuable, people that the system wants, and tries, to treat like second-class citizens, but who, with the help of the Bronx Defenders, refuse to be treated that way.

My Client

Who persevered through drug addiction, alcoholism, jail, depression, and humiliation, to complete a two-year intensive drug program, overcame many obstacles, and is now clean, reunited with her daughter, and trying hard to find work.

Undeserving of Santa's Presents

The California State Prison System

For overcrowding its prisons through its drug war, longer sentences, and three-strikes-you're-out laws, then seeking to alleviate its burden by shipping inmates to other states' prisons, far away from the prisoners' families, and then announcing last week that up to 33,000 prisoners may be entitled to release earlier than scheduled because the state has miscalculated their sentences and then failed, for nearly two years, to recalculate those sentences despite a series of court rulings, including one by the California Supreme Court.

Presiding Judge of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Sharon Keller

For turning away the last appeal of a death row inmate, Michael Richard, because his lawyers, who were having computer problems, needed 20 additional minutes to file their appeal, taking them beyond the court's 5 p.m. closing time. Mr. Richard's lawyers wanted to argue that the lethal injection procedure to be used to kill him was cruel and unusual, based on the United States Supreme Court's recent decision to review the same question in Kentucky. But since Judge Keller would not take their appeal after 5 p.m., Mr. Richard's appeal was incomplete and the state court was not able to issue a definitive ruling, thus prevented Mr. Richard from properly appealing to the United States Supreme Court to stay his execution. Two days after the state killed Mr. Richard, the Supreme Court blocked another lethal injection in Texas based on the question of whether lethal injection as administered is cruel and unusual, and there have been no executions since.

Alabama Governor Bob Riley

For refusing to grant DNA testing to death row inmate Tommy Arthur, testing which would likely either confirm Mr. Arthur's guilt or prove his innocence.

Former Attorney General Alberto Gonzales

For running a politically-driven Justice Department, hiring and firing attorneys based on party affiliations and in order to protect Republicans from legitimate investigations, authorizing torture of detainees held in American custody, giving untruthful testimony to the Senate, and being nothing more than a toady of the Bush Administration.

Any Active Proponent of the War on Drugs

For contributing to the incarceration of nonviolent offenders for shockingly long prison terms, and to America's unparalleled (and racially and economically disproportionate) prison population of 2.3 million, which has destroyed communities, cost taxpayers' millions of dollars, and filled the coffers of prison builders.

President George W. Bush

For doing nothing of note in the realm of criminal justice except pardon Scooter Libby, not pardon thousands of others, waste trillions of hard-earned taxpayers' dollars on a disingenuous, misguided war instead of on important domestic programs (including programs to improve schools, health, and alleviate poverty), create torture-filled detention centers, known and unknown, around the world, from Guantanamo to Bagram to Abu Ghraib to secret prisons in Europe and elsewhere, and held detainees, uncharged, for over six years, while arrogantly proclaiming that they are outside the reach of American or international law (as he and Dick Cheney also clearly consider themselves).

The American Prison System

For increasing our state and federal prison population eightfold since 1970 (from 196,429 to 1.5 million, not including another 750,000 in our jails), despite numerous studies that have found that there is no consistent relationship between incarceration rates and crime rates; for a projected growth of almost another 200,000 over the next five years, increasing our incarceration rate from its already excessive 491 per 100,000 population to 562; for the $60 billion spent each year on corrections, projected to increase $27.5 billion over the next five years; for incarcerating blacks and Latinos at a rate six times greater than whites; for crippling poor and working-class neighborhoods through the mass incarceration of young men; for being the world's leader in imprisonment, both in sheer number (ahead of China, despite China's size) and in rate (far ahead of the country next in line, Russia); for incarcerating people twice as long as England for the same crimes, three times as long as Canada, four times as long as the Netherlands, and five times as long as France and Sweden; and for increasing the amount of time people serve on their sentences. According to a recent report by the JFA Institute titled "Unlocking America: Why and How to Reduce America's Prison Population," the prison system is "our own American apartheid."

Thank you, Santa, safe travels, and Happy Holidays.

Posted at 8:48 AM, Dec 25, 2007 in Civil Rights | Criminal Justice | Foreign Policy | New York | Prisons | Racial Justice | Voting Rights | Permalink | Comments (2)


Comments

Great article.I'll be adding this site to my blogroll and would appreciate the same. If this site is registered with Technorati, I'll also be adding it to my favorites and would appreciate the same. Thanks and happy holidays.

Posted by: Nick | December 26, 2007 01:22 PM

The American Justice System: Our biggest threat to national security


The American Justice System is, at present, largely ineffectual and counterproductive. Its original purpose of protection, prevention, punishment and correction is not achievable with the current policies, procedures and laws in place. Any person incarcerated today is highly unlikely to re-enter society a better, more stable and less crime-prone individual. Instead, with almost certain inevitability, the former inmate will have become cynical, mistrusting of authority, unable to find adequate employment and indeed less capable to deal with the world in a normal, reasonable manner.
A modern penitentiary is nothing short of a university for advanced degrees in crime and mayhem. It is a miasmal microcosm serving only to breed misanthropes, addicts and failures of humanity.
When the public cries out for more police force, more aggressive prosecution and harsher sentencing, they unintentionally counteract the desired results. According to the U. S. Department of Justice, two-thirds to three-fourths of all convicted individuals will be re-arrested within three years of release. These figures are steadily rising.
Most first-time offenders placed in prisons and jails around the nation are perfectly capable of becoming productive, safe and normal citizens in the wake of criminal activity. However, the longer the incarceration lasts, the poorer the prospect is for recovery. The entire approach to punishment and correction must be re-evaluated. Unless we vote in radical changes to the penal system, we will continue to face exponential increases in crime rates, continued prison overcrowding, a rapidly expanding underclass of criminal re-offenders and subsequent heavy social and economic burdens.

Our society has for decades reveled in media that encourages self-righteous notions about crime. Programs like American Justice, CSI, Nancy Grace, The Shield, Law and Order, America’s Most Wanted, COPS, etc. fosters the idea that I, the concerned and engaged citizen, am the virtual police officer, the prosecutor, the jury and the judge. I relate to the law enforcement professionals on a personal level, becoming “the righteous one”. As such, I will at the next election facilitate the furtherance of this position by voting for officials that take a firm stand against crime. Someone that will hook’em, book’em, lock’em up and throw away the key. The reality is that these attitudes are detrimental to society in the long run.
We have become a community that isolates convicts, shunning all contact with them. Former inmates eventually become incapacitated in the “normal” world, and will only find acceptance in circles of like-minded and similarly educated or experienced groups. For example, on a job application for just about any type of work, and certainly for a position that is well paid, you must disclose if you have ever been convicted of a crime. This may not necessarily prevent the felon from getting the job, but it definitely puts him in a darker light compared to other applicants. It is understood that such information is required in order to “protect” the employer and the company, but our built-up resistance, fear, discrimination and prejudice toward former inmates are biases that reduces the possibility for rehabilitation of the individual. Once again, the end result is that the convict will be disenfranchised with “normal” people, seek to “his own kind”, and re-enter the criminal environment. We MUST take swift action to bring about comprehensive reform in the way we administer justice in this country, or we will undoubtedly face grave consequences.
A broad, society-wide change in philosophy toward crime and punishment must be advocated. It is certain to slow, if not altogether arrest, the out-of-control crime rates. We cannot accept criminal behavior, but we can learn to accept and forgive the perpetrators. We must separate the action from the person, and understand that to make an error is human, and often correctable with a little effort. Rehabilitation is paramount, and instead of lengthy prison-sentences, we must focus on truly correcting the undesirable behavior through proven programs. Also, there must be realistic limits to probation and parole conditions. Often, the constraints ordered by the courts are so prohibitively strict that normal functioning in the real world is impossible. It is merely a set-up for failure.
A wise man once professed: “If you want a man to be as he is, treat him as he is. If you want a man to be better, treat him as if he is better.”
I am not saying that we should forgive the likes of Charles Manson, but very few entering incarceration are like him. Many, however, exit the prisons infected with his foul disease.
By taking concise measures immediately, we can collectively bring about the necessary changes to the broken correctional system. It will require us to make concessions and to give way to thoughts that are hitherto unfamiliar and possibly uncomfortable. In order to have total national security, we must change how we respond to crime and criminals on all fronts. The present approach does not work.

Signed, J. Boger, Concerned Citizen

Posted by: Julene Boger | April 2, 2008 12:30 PM


Post a comment

Verification: