Maureen Lane
Homage to All Mothers
Today is Mother's Day. As most of the mothers with whom I work (all of whom have young children, infants to school age) point out, we can celebrate mothers in an ongoing basis every day. Nevertheless, this day is set aside to pay homage to our mothers. It's important to ask, though, how do we honor mothers living in poverty?
This day is particularly poignant for me because I've seen firsthand the courage and tenacity of women receiving welfare while caring for children. Raising a family in poverty is excruciating. Mothers make decisions about which bills are paid and which are not based on the family's need for food, shelter and health care monthly.
Around the country political leaders are taking a food stamp challenge to see if they can make ends meet on a food stamp budget. The average food stamp benefit is $1.16 per person per meal, which averages $113 a month for an individual and $200 for a family. The media will follow these stories for a bit but mothers will be trying to feed their families on $200 a month long after the news coverage stops and until policy is changed to increase food stamps and align benefits to regional food prices, which makes much more sense that the one-size-fits-all approach we have now.
All mothers know the importance of health care for young kids. A new report by the Georgetown Center for Children and Families (CCF) confirms that state governments are taking strong steps to strengthen and expand children’s health coverage, but we need federal policy commitments to strengthen and expand quality health care. Studies have shown that quality, affordable health care makes a dramatic difference in a child’s life chances.Congress has taken strong initial steps, and we need follow-through.
Women receiving welfare are 82% more likely to sustain employment if they have quality childcare[pdf]. But as the National Women's Law Center notes, most families do not qualify for childcare assistance even at the low, low income of about $32,000 a year for a family of three. Eligibility for assistance needs to drastically expand to be helpful for families who need childcare. We know quality childcare is essential and is sorely unavailable.
The Food Stamp Program helps strengthen families and the communities where those families reside (as consumers) and The National Journal recently identified the Food Stamp Program as one of government's top successes. These programs successfully support poor families and benefit us all. Why do politicians say they respect the role of mothers and the importance of families to our national well-being and yet these programs go begging for the money and commitment they need from government?
I remember the story of one mother I came across. Diane had two children, was in a shelter and going to college while receiving welfare. Diane was in her last semester when she was attending a welfare advocacy meeting where one of the other mothers receiving public benefits stood up and proudly announced she was "not like the other women on welfare who sleep all day and don't take care of her kids." After a strained silence, Diane got up and gently said to the woman, "Don't be too harsh on those other mothers. I was one of them....When my kids and I left my abusive husband and moved to a shelter, I was so depressed, I could barely get up to take them to school." Diane said, "I am almost ready to graduate and I have a job offer and my children's future has more possibility. Mine too."
Too often, politicians have grossly misrepresented mothers receiving welfare for their own political gain. Consequently, we have all suffered from cockamamie social policies based on cruel stereotypes and myths. Actually, mothers, poor low-income and middle class, are alike in their need for child-care, health care and nutritious food for their families to thrive.
On this Mother's Day I will remember the gallant, hard working, stressed-out but joyous women who are mothering in the real world of poverty. I ask that the next time you hear someone start to malign those "welfare mothers" you recount the story of Diane. She and millions like her deserve our respect and accolades. I think that is a fitting homage.
Posted at 7:28 AM, May 13, 2007 in Economic Oppertunity | Education | Employment | Welfare | public services | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBack (0)








Comments
Up here in Canada we are trying to get government to notice that child poverty (which they feel is bad) is caused by parental poverty and that a tax system which ignores that it costs money to raise a child actually causes proverty. Instead of birth bonuess, family allowance, child dependent deductions and other tax recognitions to help with costs of raising a child, many governments are still stuck in a traditional male-paradigm view of the economy that says if you are taking care of a child, you are not working at all, not productive, not part of the labor force and basically a drain on the economy. The expression' working mother' used only for mothers who earn, is illogical given that every other role uses 'working' for those doing it- working engineer is someone engineering. What I am trying to get our governments to do is to look past funding escapes from kids as ways to value kids but to get them to value taking care of kids itself- whether it happens in a daycare, at home or with a grandma. The quickest route out of child poverty and welfare frankly is to redefine work. A mother on welfare is a working women. Get over it if you disagree - She is a working woman.
Posted by: Beverley Smith | May 13, 2007 08:05 PM
Nicely stated but it's terribly unfortunate that politicos who SHOULD know better, let their common sense be over-ridden in exchange for campaign convenience. Still; one day they'll learn WHO truly needs help from the city. Hint: It's NOT the billion-dollar companies!
Posted by: Paul | May 16, 2007 11:50 AM
beverely and paul,
thank you for your comments. beverley, i agree with your point about inlcuding activities beyond earning a wage into the definition of work. also, paul, you make a great point: politics often trumps good policy. this is too often true.
thanks,
maureen
Posted by: maureen | May 17, 2007 02:26 PM