Nikki Zeichner
Why is it News when Restaurant Workers Protest?
Anthony Ramirez of the New York Times reported last week that restaurant workers were locked out of an Upper West Side restaurant after protesting against working conditions and refusing to sign what they called an illegal contract stating that they earned $7.15 /hour when in fact they often earned less than $2/hour. The article profiles one restaurant employee in particular, a 23 year old deliveryman from Fujian, China, with limited English proficiency. After he was robbed at gunpoint while on the job, the restaurant owners required that he pay them back the $300 that was stolen from him. In protest of all these injustices, 30 workers picketed outside with placards.
Why is this news though? How often do we see picketers accompanied by larger-than-life rats blown up in front of businesses that have somehow wronged their workers? What's so special about another protest?
This protest was special because it's rare for us to see restaurant workers organize. Though arguments have been made that unionization would be good for owners and workers alike, the vast majority of restaurants in the City are currently non-union, and restaurant workers who protest have few places to turn for support. Restaurant workers who protest face losing their jobs and possibly worse retaliatory threats, such as that of deportation.
There is dramatic disparity in the way that restaurants run their businesses in this city; among a majority of exploitative establishments, there are restaurants that are taking the higher road. Through working with Wage to Live (as well as by working in the industry) I've come to know a good number of restaurant owners that are taking care of their workers by providing health benefits, paid sick leave, and opportunities for promotion. Wage to Live is working on helping consumers identify these restaurants so that they can support them. But in the mean time, there's not really any way of knowing which restaurants are looking out for their workers. And as such, it's easy for employers to justify cutting corners. Like, encouraging their employees to sign illegal contracts as discussed in Ramirez's article.
And, if I were 23 years old and I couldn't fully communicate in English, would I have the courage to picket outside of my workplace? I'm not sure: as things currently exist in the industry, I imagine I'd feel that I'd have too much to lose. I'd feel as though I'd be on my own with little or no backing. I'd be too afraid.
Perhaps that's why this protest by restaurant workers was so newsworthy.
Nikki Zeichner: Author Bio | Other Posts
Posted at 1:17 PM, Mar 12, 2007 in
Permalink | Email to Friend | Comments (2)











Comments
This is my first visit to the DMIblog, and I'm really glad to see this piece on restaurant workers on the front page. I've been in the food industry for 10 years, and I have seen first-hand the need for new approaches to organizing food service workers. Part of what needs to happen is just this - public attention paid to new approaches.
The Chinese Staff & Workers Association (CSWA) ( http://www.cswa.org/www/index.asp ) - one of the main organizations backing the Justice Will Be Served Campaign mentinoned in the article (along with the 318 Restaurant Workers Union, an independent union set up to organize Chinese workers ignored by the AFL unions) - has been doing the difficult work of pioneering new approaches for years.
The other organization worth metioning in relation to this post is the Restaurant Opportunities Center (ROC) ( http://www.rocny.org/ ), the organization responsible for "Behind the Kitchen Door," the report linked to in the post.
One problem I think needs to be addressed, though, is that the theory of "high road" options available to restaurant owners is partial, at best. All of the examples I have seen of "high road" practices are restaurants which either own their own buildings, or have special lease arrangements. This is hardly the situation for most restuarant owners (particularly in NYC). Much of the profit (in all likelyhood, the majority of them) squeezed out of the super-exploitation that occurs in the restaurant industry goes directly into the pockets of landlords. While many restaurant owners are vile, they rarely amount to more than small-fry, compared to the landlords, who sit back and collect monthly checks from dozens of operations.
Posted by: sam | March 13, 2007 10:55 PM
What is going on with restaurant recruiters. We recently used a company named HPS or Hospitality Pro Search and then found out they were sourcing our managers, placing them with other clients, and then trying to place new managers for our group! Please tell all to stear clear of this group, no integrity and no ethics!!
Posted by: John Smith | March 22, 2007 08:06 PM