DMI Blog

Mark Winston Griffith

In Defense of the CRA and ACORN

One helluva week.

I'm not just talking about the re-emergence of the Let's Ignore the American Housing Crisis Act of 2008, otherwise known as the economic rescue bill. I'm also referring to the repeated conservative attacks on the Community Reinvestment Act, which are embedded with the argument that the CRA is responsible for the mortgage meltdown and our current economic state. The CRA is the 1977 federal legislation that addressed the American legacy of bank redlining by mandating that banks provide equal banking and credit opportunities to traditionally underserved neighborhoods with safety and soundness. Blaming this landmark legislation for the past few years of abusive lending is like blaming the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for a recent uptick in hate crime.

I blogged about this absurd line of reasoning months ago when it first started rearing it's ugly head, but I dismissed it as a temporary, desperate ploy to make the public take its collective eye off of the real subprime crisis culprit, deregulation. The most obvious point to be made is that the majority of institutions that made subprime loans are non-depository institutions that are not even covered by the CRA. And anyone who thinks that anything other than profit margins and the desire to elude risk drove the growth of the mortgage securitization market is smoking some strong stuff.

Usually arguments that have absolutely NO factual underpinnings die, right? Nope. Like a gang of roaches that have developed immunity to conventional repellents, conservatives have been coming out from under the kitchen cabinet over the past week, impervious to the truth and common sense. In what could be only viewed as a coordinated messaging campaign originating from the same cock-eyed memo, conservatives took to the radio, television, newspaper and blogsphere to spread their loopy talking points.

But there also has been a disturbing subtext to the argument, that ACORN and other community reinvestment advocates are also to blame for the crisis. The reasoning is that organizations that have used the CRA to embarrass financial institutions into helping to build low- and moderate-income neighborhoods, and communities of color, are somehow pressing for the lowering of underwriting standards. This of course completely ignores the fact that ACORN as well as the entire community reinvestment organizing and advocacy community, which includes me, have done little else over the last ten years than fight AGAINST subprime mortgages and predatory lending practices, and to RAISE lending standards.

As anyone knows, I have been critical of some of ACORN's tactics in the past. But when it comes to organizing around community reinvestment causes, they have been on the side of righteousness. Few organizations have done more nationwide to advance the cause of economic justice than ACORN.

How do I know? Because I cut my political teeth in the early nineties as a community organizer, pressing banks to invest more in Central Brooklyn. If not for the Community Reinvestment Act and those campaigns, the Credit Union I co-founded would have never have come to be. Our CRA efforts in Central Brooklyn led directly to the Credit Union receiving thousands of dollars in deposits from area banks, acquiring a bank branch building, and its ability to make millions of dollars of loans to people who had been shut out of the mainstream banking system. And we never, ever made a subprime loan.

I just returned from the Kirwan Institute's conference in Columbus, Ohio on Subprime Lending, Foreclosure and Race. Instead of focusing on how to re-invent the CRA to fit the needs of the 21st century we spent valuable time defending its inherent value. In that respect the conservatives have won the battle, but not the war. The only way to counter their attacks is with the truth, which includes the message that only re-regulation and the broadening of the CRA to include non-depository institutions will keep us from falling into this financial crisis again.

Mark Winston Griffith: Author Bio | Other Posts
Posted at 1:31 PM, Oct 03, 2008 in Economic Opportunity
Permalink | Email to Friend | Comments (6)


Comments

If Barack Obama had just done those town hall meetings, John McCain wouldn't have been forced to make commercials with lies in them. If banks weren't forced to lend in historically redlined neighborhoods, they wouldn't have been forced to lend abusively. For a group of people that supposedly care about taking personal responsibility, it sure seems the finger of blame is always getting pointed instead at the white-flag-waving East Coast elitists (and their community organizer friends).

Posted by: Chris K | October 3, 2008 03:11 PM

This message is catching on. CRA and ACORN are apparently the culprits (scapegoats) of this whole financial mess. Barack better be ready on this attack line. My conservative friends are now disseminating this all over the Net, Radio, and TV. It has almost a racial tone to it too!!! Much of the conservative message alludes to "minorities who couldn't afford homes" were given them by banks, forced to lend to them because of pressure from ACORN, the CRA, the Democrats!

Posted by: Jim Young | October 7, 2008 01:39 PM

This message is catching on. CRA and ACORN are apparently the culprits (scapegoats) of this whole financial mess. Barack better be ready on this attack line. My conservative friends are now disseminating this all over the Net, Radio, and TV. It has almost a racial tone to it too!!! Much of the conservative message alludes to "minorities who couldn't afford homes" were given them by banks, forced to lend to them because of pressure from ACORN, the CRA, the Democrats!

Posted by: Jim Young | October 7, 2008 01:40 PM

Knowing someone close to me, who actually works in a community development agency, funded by HUD. An agency that spent considerable effort and time in preparing their clients for home ownership. And who's dedicated workers, who had the responsibilty for the success of their loans in their first time home buyer program, on seening their clients through challengers they faced, even after the closing. This effort has resulted in a 3% or less failure rate, for mortgages that would be considered risky. What is the service provided by the community groups such as ACORN? Do they do the appropriate screening and prepare their clients for home ownership? What are their default rate? Do they care for the long term financial health of their clients?

Posted by: Scott Bagetis | October 9, 2008 12:30 PM

I am confused --didn't the credit union you helped found fail? Raising the hopes of the people only to dash them a few years later.

Posted by: lone wolf mccain | October 11, 2008 09:28 PM

Lone Wolf McCain - Nice try, Poison Pen. Central Brooklyn Federal merged with another credit union, People's Alliance, that is still very much around today. I still have my account there.

Posted by: Mark Winston Griffith | October 13, 2008 12:57 PM


Post a comment

Verification: