Mark Winston Griffith
Myrtle Avenue: 700 Billion Miles from Wall Street
It may not bear the name of the mythical place, "Main Street", but Myrtle Avenue is nonetheless the bustling commercial heart of Bushwick, Brooklyn. And it's on Myrtle Avenue where you will find the banking headquarters of the Brooklyn Cooperative Federal Credit Union.
Unlike Washington Mutual, which last night joined the growing list of busted financial institutions, Brooklyn Cooperative seems, thus far at least, impervious to the economic landslides happening around it. It's another reminder of no matter how much economic doom and gloom actually awaits us, all the talk of "bailout" can seem pretty remote on some corners of Main Street.
"We're just not seeing anything that suggests that members are worried about the safety of their savings here at the credit union," observed Jack Lawson, the Brooklyn Cooperative Manager. "The state of our loan [and mortgage] portfolio is healthier today than it was at the end of 2007…We're funding it locally, mostly by member savings and our own lines of business here, so the credit crunch and the liquidity crisis that is being felt in the macro economy isn't really having much of an effect on our day-to-day business."
The 5200 members of Brooklyn Cooperative are mostly low-income and working class people who are not deeply invested in the stock market. Bushwick has one of the highest foreclosure rates in Brooklyn, but most of the members are renters. Antoinette Darling, a Brooklyn Cooperative member who aspires to build a retirement savings, and perhaps own a home one day, said that she is more worried about the state of America in general than she is about the risk to her own financial well being. No matter how much risk she actually faces in the event of a severe financial downturn, the dangers to the economy that President Bush described the other night, as he was making his case for the bailout, were largely an abstraction for her.
Clearly, the more you have at stake in the capital markets of this economy, the more threatened you feel. Teckler Queely-Boyd, who runs a family day care in Crown Heights, has been closely following the headlines. "Sure I'm concerned. I don't have a lot of investments like others, but I have a home." As a micro-entrepreneur whose business is directly connected to the fortunes of her neighbors, her community's anxiety may instantly become her own: "What if my parents lose their jobs, or prices go up on them? How will they be able to pay for child care?"
Still, Ms. Queely,-Boyd, like most Americans, doesn't understand why people outside the financial services industry might lose their jobs. Or why inflation could get out of control. Or why, at a time when mortgages are going bad, someone might have difficulty getting, say, a car loan. And she has no idea how bad things could actually get, or what the bailout actually promises to do for her.
You have to wonder if whether Bush or either of the presidential candidates knows enough about the economy to clearly connect the dots between the bailout and the fortunes of ordinary people. The first political personality to actually explain the reality of this economic moment will earn the title "leader".
Mark Winston Griffith: Author Bio | Other Posts
Posted at 2:49 PM, Sep 26, 2008 in Economy
Permalink | Email to Friend | Comments (4)











Comments
lets get a list of the 205 that voted for this bill and vote them OUT!!!
Posted by: Frank | September 29, 2008 03:35 PM
Thanks Mark.
Listening to all this talk of "small businesses can't get credit!" as the great tragedy of the Wall street shenanigans, I can't help but wonder if there isn't a cheaper solution that would focus in on the actual problem. Like community investment. Like local credit unions.
Posted by: amanda | September 30, 2008 01:05 PM
Community investment's great, if you want to start a bodega. If you want to start something that actually powers an economy - say, an engineering firm - then low-income communities will complain that it won't provide employment to the local poor and fight the idea, and high-income communities won't provide community credit because they have real banks for people to put their money in.
The only concrete lesson I can learn from this post, by the way, is that home ownership makes people more vulnerable to financial shakedowns and should probably not be encouraged so much.
Posted by: Alon Levy | September 30, 2008 05:21 PM
Alon, I think you are making some overly broad, rather condescending assumptions about what "community investment" looks like. There's a lot more than bodegas being built in low and moderate income neighborhoods, thank you very much. And I don't know why a "engineering firm" would inherently mean community reinvestment. Is it just because it's white collar? It depends as much on how that firm interacts with the surrounding community than it does on what industry it represents.
In Bed-Stuy for instance, decades ago IBM placed a plant in Bed-Stuy that was welcomed by the surrounding area. And then IBM downsized and eventually closed down the plant and hundreds more like it across the country, pulling out whatever jobs and "investments" it had in the area. It was then replaced by a computer production and engineering cooperative started by former, often times local, IBM employees. But the company couldn't find it's niche in the market and it eventually closed. Now there's a Home Depot on that site, which was not only welcomed by the neighborhood, but which has hired local people and has helped fuel the Brownstone home improvements in the area.
The only concrete thing that I agree with in your post is that homeownership carries enormous risks and, when not coupled with safeguards to make sure people could actually KEEP their homes, was overly encouraged.
Posted by: Mark Winston Griffith | October 7, 2008 09:37 AM