DMI Blog

Mark Winston Griffith

When Predatory Equity Becomes Landlord, Affordable Housing Suffers

The New York Times features a story today by Gretchen Morgenson that probes "predatory equity" practices in the rent regulated housing market. Revealing yet another heartless dimension of capitalism and New York real estate, Morgenson's piece reports that private equity firms are buying up rent-regulated properties in New York with the single purpose of chasing out tenants and then jacking up the rents as high as the law will allow:

"In the last four years, developers backed by private equity firms have acquired almost 75,000 rent-regulated apartments...These companies often make clear that raising rents is crucial to their financial goals. On its Web site, Normandy Partners states 'the increased institutional appetite for New York City rent-stabilized housing transactions' and adds: 'There is a near-term opportunity to increase cash flow by converting rent-stabilized apartments to market rate as tenants vacate units'...

"But the New York City Rent Guidelines Board says the vacancy rate on rent-regulated apartments is 5.6 percent each year. Buildings with vacancy rates far higher suggest resident harassment, tenant advocates say. Vacancy rates have risen above 20 percent in some buildings owned by Vantage Properties; in some Normandy buildings, the rates exceed 30 percent. If an apartment is rent regulated, yearly increases cannot exceed the amount set annually by the Guidelines Board. Most recently, it was 3 percent on a one-year renewal lease. When an apartment becomes vacant, rents can climb as much as 20 percent. When that rent rises above $2,000, regulations no longer apply, and tenants must pay market prices."

These predatory equity tactics pose a serious threat to affordable housing goals in New York. If there was ever a practice that warranted an investigation, it's this one.

Mark Winston Griffith: Author Bio | Other Posts
Posted at 8:31 AM, May 09, 2008 in Economy
Permalink | Email to Friend | Comments (3)


Comments

I second that last sentiment. Working in the affordable housing world, harassment in rent-regulated apartments is just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to private equity firms. Predatory investment companies are flipping portfolios of multi-family, federally-assisted rental buildings (to them, they are undervalued assets) to the highest bidders. This ultimately means the last one holding the building will either have to work to remove tenants because current rents are too low to sustain the building, or the buildings will fall so far into disrepair, the feds will be forced to foreclose. This issue in its entirety deserves to be put under a microscope.

Posted by: Bonnie | May 12, 2008 03:16 PM

The biggest problem about this right now is that by the time anybody "investigates" this the affordable units will be out of circulation and being that there being no rent regulations in NY any longer, they are out of the system forever, with no replacements. City-funded or aided (ie with tax abatements) housing that is considered affordable is actually very expensive and not affordable to even middle income people. It's the last straw that will kill any semblance of affordable housing in NY.

Posted by: jill | May 24, 2008 07:00 PM

Predatory equity is a problem nationally. Tenants in California are experiencing similar problems with these funds.

Please visit www.epa-tenants.org for details on a fund operating in the San Francisco Bay Area, Page Mill Properties II.

The primary source of equity for this fund is CalPERS, the California Public Employee Retirement System. Sad, but true.

Posted by: Christopher Lund | July 1, 2009 04:18 AM


Post a comment

Verification: