Corinne Ramey
Getting Beyond Corn: It’s Time to Talk About Cities
Corn seems to be the issue of choice for the presidential candidates. Speeches in Iowa are peppered with a healthy dose of talk about corn-based ethanol and farm subsidies, and candidates give stump speeches surrounded by fields of corn or at county fairs with corn dogs, corn fritters, and corn on the cob.
Go to the websites of both the Democratic candidates, and you find that corn gets a special place. Barack Obama lists "Rural" in the issues section of his website, and includes a 14-page "Rural Plan Fact Sheet." Hillary Clinton has a "Creating Opportunity in Rural America" section, several press releases, and a PDF called "Hillary's Vision for Rural America," which begins with a photo of a beaming Clinton surrounded by flannel shirt clad members of the Farmers Union. Undoubtedly, the candidates care about corn and the communities and people (and, uh, lobbyists) that produce it. But what about the rest of us? Might all this attention on corn and country be taking the focus away from the rest of America?
Contrary to what the presidential candidates might have you believe, most of us live in urban areas. Over 80% of the U.S. population lives in cities or their metropolitan areas. Cities -- not corn -- largely drive the U.S. economy. According to the Brookings Institute, the top 100 metro areas in the U.S. comprise 12% of our land mass yet account for 75% of our G.D.P. These 100 cities hold 76% of our knowledge economy jobs and cities as a whole drive 90% of our economy.
These cities have their own unique sets of challenges. Decades-old infrastructure is crumbling, and cities are overflowing with traffic congestion and environmental problems. Homeowners fight the subprime crisis and rising housing costs and public schools struggle with budget cuts.
In the face of these unique issues facing cities and lack of urban policy talk coming from candidates, The Drum Major Institute recently collaborated with The Nation to ask for thoughts on urban issues from the people who know cities best: mayors. The result of the project was MayorTV, which, when taken as a whole, paints a picture of a country in need of a coherent urban policy.
The mayors lamented the lack of federal support for urban areas. As Boston mayor Tom Menino said, "Because Washington has no urban agenda, the cities in this country are doing poorly. Unemployment is up. Faith in the economy has gone down. Crime has gone up." Antonio Villaraigosa, the mayor of Los Angeles, agreed. "Whether it's poverty, work and opportunity, bolstering the middle class, housing or infrastructure," he said, "it is absolutely criminal that the federal government has failed to address these issues."
Denver mayor John Hickenlooper described cities as America's laboratories: testing sites for the national policies of the future. "Down here where the rubber meets the road, we're fixing potholes, we're making cities safer, we're solving problems around health care ... we can figure out the solutions. We're America's laboratories." The federal government, he said, needs to support cities to carry out effective policy. "As we find cost-effective ways to address these issues, whether you're talking about homeless or economic development ... once we find those solutions, we need help making sure that we have the resources to role them out to the whole community and the whole country." Minneapolis Mayor R.T. Rybak said there is a "messages of exclusion" coming out of Washington, and that he feels diversity is what has made his city strong. "You can hardly go to a block in Minneapolis where there isn't a significant contribution from the gay and lesbian community," he said. "And you can go to streets that were totally moribund before large scale immigration happened that are totally revised because of it."
There's nothing wrong with the candidates' discussion of corn-filled rural issues. After all, corn manages to sneak its way into our lives in all kinds of ways, from our food to our fuel and in policies from immigration to trade. However, a truly national conversation this election season should give cities the attention that rural America has received for years.
Cross-posted from the Movement Vision Lab blog
Posted at 6:39 AM, Mar 01, 2008 in Cities | MayorTV | Permalink | Comments (5)








Comments
So, what is it that causes politicians to underemphasize urban issues so much? Is that the primary schedule that gives Iowa undue attention? Or is it something else?
Posted by: Alon Levy | March 1, 2008 03:18 PM
Corinne is right about both cities and corn. In Sierra Club NYC's new report, "Sustainable Energy Independence for NYC," we explain that corn has a negative return on energy invested, and that better transportation requires conservation and efficiency upgrades first, as we move toward expansion of electric-powered transit systems. Second, progressive urban responses going well beyond PlaNYC initiatives discussed so far will be necessary both for urban communities - and everywhere else. See the report at www.beyondoilnyc.org.
Dan Miner
Sierra Club NYC Group, Chair
Posted by: Dan Miner | March 1, 2008 04:55 PM
I think you may have stressed the contrasts between corn and cities more than the differences will bear because, to shameless steal a phrase, we're all connected. The price of oil, the price of corn and the weakness of the dollar all impact very directly on us city mice as well as our country cousins.
The weak dollar pushes oil prices higher, makes our homes more expensive to heat and food more expensive to produce. The corn of your example requires fuel to produce & market. It feeds people and hogs. As the price of fuel goes up, as corn is diverted to ethanol production, food prices have gone way up. Even we city dwellers are paying much, much more for milk, butter, meat. Food pantry shelves are emptied and international feeding programs are triaged.
It may not look like urban policy when a weak dollar makes NYC luxury housing more affordable for foreign dollars, but it is. Lower income New Yorkers compete for housing with the world's wealthiest. Low and moderate income New Yorkers lose their production and service sector jobs to even lower wage competitors abroad which makes rising housing and food prices even less affordable.
The hard task facing us in the next few years no matter who's elected president (Myself, I'm for Obama) will be to reverse Bush policies which have consistently enriched the wealthiest among us by taking from and harming low and moderate income people no matter where they live.
Posted by: Daniel Millstone | March 1, 2008 08:59 PM
I see your point, Daniel, but you're going overboard with the rhetoric. The weak dollar makes it easy for a handful of foreign millionaires to rent in New York, but that's mostly the problem of the local millionaires. More importantly, it makes imports more expensive and exports more competitive. That's why in Canada everybody's worried about the strong Canadian dollar, which is killing the country's manufacturing base.
The Bush policy that needs to be reversed is fiscal irresponsibility, and I don't see Obama or McCain try addressing it. Twice in history has the US had sustained growth-time deficits together with low interest rates; twice in history has it resulted in stagflation. But Obama says reducing the deficit is less important than spending more on health care, and McCain thinks it's all about the pork.
Posted by: Alon Levy | March 1, 2008 09:56 PM
also, let's ad the fact that corn is at a record high price. Why should the government subsidize a crop that is the most expensive it's ever been? http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aWemHi1hnXRk
Posted by: Tim Shea | March 4, 2008 12:33 PM