Corinne Ramey
The College Cost Reduction Act: Ten Out of Ten College Students Agree That It’s Better Than Cafeteria Food!
Blog Post About DMI's TheMiddleClass.org
College newspapers aren't usually filled with stories about Congress. I know that my college newspaper was way more likely to have a front page story about questionable cafeteria food than about some piece of national legislation. But college newspapers around the country are currently covering one very important bill -- The College Cost Reduction Act of 2007 -- that matters to college students in a very big way. From Swarthmore's The Phoenix to the University of Southern Mississippi's Student Printz to the Llama Ledger of Simon's Rock College, college students agree that this bill is big news -- maybe even more important than the latest overpriced-pizza-in-the-cafeteria scandal.
The act, which was officially passed on September 27, helps to make college more affordable in several important ways. The bill increases the maximum Pell Grant for students from low-income students to $5,200, an increase of $500 over the next four years. The bill also reduces interest rates for federally-subsidized students loans, increases eligibility criteria for Pell Grants, and guarantees that low-income borrowers will not have to spend more than 15% of their income to repay student loans. The legislation also provides tuition assistance for graduates that pursue public service careers such as nursing, firefighting, or teaching. There are also grants to colleges with high minority student enrollment and incentives to keep tuition costs from rising. The bill is estimated to cost $18.7 billion. But instead of using taxpayer money, the bill will be payed for by reducing federal subsidies to companies that provide student loans. As the recent student loan scandals have shown, these lenders -- some already faced with corruption and criminal charges -- don't exactly need any more federal assistance.
But not only college students should care about the College Cost Reduction Act of 2007. College affordability affects everyone -- from the poorest families to the super-rich. It is almost impossible to attain a middle class standard of living without a college education, making affordable higher education crucial to the prosperity, economic strength, and global-competitiveness of the country as a whole.
As TheMiddleClass.org says, students have become saddled with debt, making college increasingly unaffordable.
"The value of federal student aid programs, such as Pell Grants, has failed to keep pace with rising college costs, while many states have reduced their support for public universities. As a result, nearly two thirds of students at four-year colleges must now borrow to finance their college education, and the typical student borrower now graduates with nearly $20,000 in debt – and some with much more . The prospect of taking on tens of thousands of dollars in debt deters some students, especially those from lower-income families, from pursuing college entirely. Meanwhile, the need to pay off costly student loans makes it impractical for many graduates to pursue public service careers in essential fields such as teaching or social work. For many young people, the burden of student loan debt makes it difficult to make ends meet on a daily basis, much less support a family or begin to save for retirement."
The statistics on student debt are fairly shocking. About 39% of college graduates under the age of 35 say that it will take them more than 10 years to pay off their college debt and 29% say they've had to delay a medical or dental procedure because of their loans. One in six of these graduates say that college loan debt has actually delayed marriage. And since the average college student who starts school in 2011 will save $4,420 under this bill, who needs to worry about that overpriced pizza anymore?
Posted at 6:39 AM, Oct 30, 2007 in TheMiddleClass.org | Permalink | Comments (2)








Comments
This bill was an utter failure. The "savings" passed through to a few borrowers in the form of grants will mean more expensive student loans for other students due to the decreased subsidies the government will pay lenders.
Congress got this one WRONG.
This bill did NOTHING to reduce the ACTUAL costs of college - namely room and board. Colleges got off scot-free with this act and have been raising tuition at a much greater rate than inflation for the past 15 years. This bill did NOTHING to make the greedy colleges accountable for their tuition.
People complain about being saddled with over $20,000 of debt when they graduate, so what good does an extra $500 in grant money do? It punishes lenders, who were competing and offering borrowers interest rates lower than the statutory and direct lending rate.
Not only did this bill HURT students, it actually will eliminate the possibility of some students to go to college. Many lenders made loans to borrowers who were not even elligible for loans under the FFELP program because of prior defaults. These borrowers will no longer be able to get an education (since they're not elligible for the grants, either).
This is a pure and simple case of idiots like this web site reading the bill, seeing something about a handout to college kids, and coming to the conclusion that this is a good thing.
Posted by: Justin | November 26, 2007 04:07 PM
Justin, I certainly agree with you that the bill isn't perfect. Ideally, it would offer a lot more aid, and address issues such as rising room and board costs. But I think you ignore a lot of good policies that are built into the bill. Decreasing unnecessary subsidies to student lenders -- and in fact, paying for the $18.7 billion cost of the bill with these reductions -- is certainly a good first step in increasing lender accountability and cutting costs. Grants to promote public service careers and improve minority enrollment are also laudable.
As for your second point, the bill will NOT eliminate the potential of students to go to college. Making this argument is like saying laws that reform predatory mortgage lending keep poor people from buying homes, something that DMI has written about here.
Holding lenders accountable will help to make college loans accessible to all, regardless of income level and background. Sure, the bill isn't perfect, but it's definitely a step in the right direction.
Posted by: Corinne Ramey | November 28, 2007 05:36 PM