Elizabeth Hartline Green
Where do the candidates stand on education? Barack Obama on education.
This is the fourth installment in an ongoing series on where the candidates stand on education.
Next on our list, we have Senator Barack Obama.
Senator Obama has promoted a long list of educational reforms he is in favor of, ranging from increased access to Advanced Placement courses to expanding summer school programs. Generally, the common thread in his educational positions is his belief that school funding must be increased in all aspects of education.
Sen. Obama is in support of expanding the Head Start preschool program for low-income children, and voted to reauthorize the program earlier this summer. Obama was also in the Illinois State Senate when its preschool program for low-income children was instated. Unlike other Democrats, though, universal preschool is not in his platform, nor has he publicly spoken, to my knowledge, about universal pre-k.
Sen. Obama was not yet in the Senate when No Child Left Behind was authorized, but has claimed, alternately, both that it should not be reauthorized and that it should be substantially reformed, with funding increased. For the most part, though, Obama says that NCLB should continue to demand accountability from states, but should increase funding and define success more broadly. Sen. Obama has said that he will produce a detailed education plan that will deal with these issues; if so, the issue of how to reform No Child Left Behind will likely be addressed. Even without this document, though, his position on NCLB will likely become more clear soon, as the Act is up for reauthorization very soon.
Teacher pay is a tricky issue with Senator Obama. It seems that he would like to institute widespread merit pay (where teachers are paid for performance, as opposed to the pay schedules that are typical in most states) and hazard pay (where teachers in low-performing schools are paid more). These stances, however, aren’t very popular with teachers unions, who believe that merit pay uses poor measures of teacher quality (like standardized test scores) that discourage high-quality teachers from teaching in low-quality schools and also allows principals to play favorites. As teachers unions are major players in the Democratic Party, some have accused Senator Obama of softening his stance on these and other school reform issues in order to keep their support (free subscription needed). Senator Obama does propose increased pay for all teachers, though, which is more likely to win him union favor.
Senator Obama’s educational theme seems to be a push for innovation. Thus, he is for charter schools (which he feels support change and progress) and is against vouchers (reasoning that they take resources away from public schools). One of Senator Obama’s pet educational ideas is what he calls innovation districts. The innovation districts plan would let school districts apply for grants to institute education reforms, and 20 districts across the country would receive the grants. The innovation districts bill would appropriate $1.5 billion yearly for these districts, or about $75 million per district. Theoretically, those districts will then be viewed as models for educational innovation in other districts, although there are no guidelines in place for assisting replication of these programs in his plan. Senator Obama introduced the innovation districts bill both in 2006 and in 2007 in the Senate, and it is still in committee.
Other education bills that Obama has introduced in the Senate include a plan for increasing the maximum Pell Grant and instituting a mentoring program for women and minorities in educational programs sponsored by the Department of Energy. The first died in committee, and the second has been passed by the Senate. Additionally, Obama introduced two bills that passed the Senate within the Higher Education Amendments of 2007 that propose to establish teaching residency programs and increase funding for predominately black colleges.
It will remain a bit nebulous what Obama would do with education until (and possibly after) he produces his detailed education proposal, whenever that may be. Right now, though, it seems his solution to our country’s educational problems would be to dramatically increase federal funding for education, which may be possible if he can build widespread support for the suggested programs (though it will be an uphill battle).
Elizabeth Hartline Green: Author Bio | Other Posts
Posted at 7:00 AM, Aug 13, 2007 in Candidates on Education
Permalink | Email to Friend | Comments (4)











Comments
Good summary, but it missed one critical aspect of Obama's merit pay proposal: Teachers are to establish the standards themselves and not use the standards of NCLB (test scores). Obama's totally opposed to teaching to a test and to administrators or politicians choosing the merit pay standards for teachers - if he hadn't said that at the NEA Conference he'd have been booed off the stage, I imagine. As I understand, where merit pay has been instituted for federal employees, almost all employees end up earning them so there've been few personal raise losses. Also, while unions might hate any kind of evaluation tied to raises, parents of students in poor districts are quite tired of how difficult it is to get blatantly inadequate teachers released from service. The unions might consider the details of Obama's proposal and its impact on increasing parents' input and approval and teacher-support before dismissing it wholesale.
Posted by: VCubed | August 13, 2007 10:24 AM
Unfortunately the senator proves himself to be another in a long line of would be education candidates. Nowhere does he address the REAL issues facing education. Essentially the entire system (K-12)is woefully obsolete and needs to be redesigned.The new design needs to be learner-centered, focusing on reforms that engage students and empower teachers to be creative in working with individual students and smaller groups on project based and constructivist activities. The feds need to get out of the uniform standards business and work on infrastructure design to enable a more decentralized, learner focused system.
Posted by the author of Lessons for Tomorrow, Bringing America's Schools Back From the Brink.
Posted by: Edward Davis | August 14, 2007 07:53 AM
Senator Obama is, like so many candidates discussing education, all talk. Merit pay is a ridiculous notion for obvious reasons, mentioned in this post.
Get rid of NCLB? Fund NCLB? Which is it? Charter schools are a mess in most cases, so it's best to focus on how to fix standard k-12 education, and he doesn't have a plan.
The only thing I like about Obama's stance is that he's against vouchers -- arguably the worst thing ever to happen to education (next to NCLB, that is).
Posted by: Bell Work Online | August 14, 2007 11:19 PM
I think that his proposals make sense... They passed the Senate, and even though it can't be a 100% proof of their value, I still think that they definitely deserve a try.
Posted by: Lucy, school teacher | August 29, 2007 03:31 PM