I think that mandatory employer provided healthcare is a fantastic idea. Living wage, fair share, and other employer aimed measures are sometimes more effective than centralized government efforts at redistributing wealth. Consider it this way, with centralized efforts those who pay the most taxes bear the greatest burden of the cost. However, corporate entities have developed legislative strategies that allow them to pass much of their tax burden to the middle class. Ultimately the people that bear much of the burden of the centralized effort are the middle class. This is an improvement over placing the burdens "where they fall" on the poor, but it is not the best solution.

Corporate responsibility efforts place the primary cost for providing services on the enterprise itself, on the employer, the corporation. When a corporation employs someone, they must provide them with enough to survive and continue working; when government provides basic services to the employed it is actually subsidizing the employers! Government should set the standards of living and force the employers to provide them, rather than subsidizing the employers indirectly by lowering the compensation they can get away with.

When people can provide for themselves, they get a sense of freedom, dignity, and power.

More importantly, fair share redistributes from the corporate fiction to the working class. The best central services can do is redistribute from the tax base (middle class) to the lowest classes.

O.K. They are out of the woods, pushing their Social Darwinist garbage, hoping the people will be forever so dumb that they will be buying this Orwellian nonsense: "When people can provide for themselves, they get a sense of freedom, dignity, and power?"
In this fascist reality people cannot provide for themselves, only fascists can.

"When a corporation employs someone, they must provide them with enough to survive and continue working"
We all know it is not true, corporations at this point behave like labor camps: you work until you can ... then next, next, next.

Lb, I suggest your masters send someone better to push their agenda

I don't use words lightly.
In my post, I used the "word" fascism a couple of times, because I just tried to describe reality, see below.

One of the description of early fascism

POWERFUL AND CONTINUING NATIONALISM

DISDAIN FOR HUMAN RIGHTS

IDENTIFICATION OF ENEMIES AS A UNIFYING CAUSE

SUPREMACY OF THE MILITARY

RAMPANT SEXISM

BULLYING AND MOBBING

CONTROLLED MASS MEDIA

OBSESSION WITH NATIONAL SECURITY

RELIGION AND GOVERNMENT INTERTWINED

CORPORATE POWER PROTECTED

LABOR POWER SUPPRESSED

DISDAIN FOR INTELLECTUALS AND THE ARTS

OBSESSION WITH CRIME AND PUNISHMENT

RAMPANT CRONYISM AND CORRUPTION

FRAUDULENT ELECTIONS